WOW! and the Feds
make "herbs" illegal???? Wonder drugs, eh???
Why so many Americans today are 'mentally ill'
DATE OF PUBLICATION: Aug 2007
Posted: August 14, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By David Kupelian
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
"When I was lying in my bed that night, I couldnt sleep because my voice
in my head kept echoing through my mind telling me to kill them."
You're reading the words of 12-year-old Christopher Pittman, struggling
to explain why he murdered his grandparents, who had provided the only love
and stability in his turbulent life. He was angry with his grandfather, who
had disciplined him earlier that day for hurting another student during a
fight on the school bus. So later that night, he shot both of his
grandparents in the head with a .410 shotgun as they slept and then burned
down their South Carolina home, where he had lived with them.
"I got up, got the gun, and I went upstairs and I pulled the trigger," he
recalled. "Through the whole thing, it was like watching your favorite TV
show. You know what is going to happen, but you cant do anything to stop
His lawyers would later argue the boy had been a victim of "involuntary
intoxication," since Pittman's doctors had him taking the antidepressants
Paxil and Zoloft just prior to the murders.
Paxil's known "adverse drug reactions" according to the drug's 2001
FDA-approved label include "mania," "insomnia," "anxiety," "agitation,"
"confusion," "amnesia," "depression," "paranoid reaction," "psychosis,"
"hostility," "delirium," "hallucinations," "abnormal thinking,"
"depersonalization" and "lack of emotion," among others.
Andrea Yates, in one of the most horrifying and heartbreaking crimes in
modern history, drowned all five of her children aged 7 years down to 6
months in a bathtub. Insisting inner voices commanded her to kill her
kids, she had become increasingly psychotic over the course of several
years. At her 2006 murder re-trial, Yates' longtime friend Debbie Holmes
testified: "She asked me if I thought Satan could read her mind and if I
believed in demon possession." And Dr. George Ringholz, after evaluating
Yates for two days, recounted an experience she had after the birth of her
"What she described was feeling a presence ... Satan ... telling her to
take a knife and stab her son Noah," Ringholz said, adding that Yates'
delusion at the time of the bathtub murders was not only that she had to
kill her children to save them, but that Satan had entered her and that
she had to be executed in order to kill Satan.
Yates had been taking the antidepressant Effexor. In November 2005, more
than four years after Yates drowned her children, Effexor manufacturer Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals quietly added "homicidal ideation" to the drug's list of
"rare adverse events." The Medical Accountability Network, a private
nonprofit focused on medical ethics issues, publicly criticized Wyeth,
saying Effexor's "homicidal ideation" risk wasn't well-publicized and that
Wyeth failed to send letters to doctors or issue warning labels announcing
And what exactly does "rare" mean in the phrase "rare adverse events"?
The FDA defines it as occurring in less than one in 1,000 people. But since,
according to an Associated Press report, about 19.2 million prescriptions
for Effexor were filled in the U.S. alone in 2005, statistically that means
thousands of Americans could experience "homicidal ideation" murderous
thoughts as a result of taking just this one brand of antidepressant drug.
Effexor is Wyeth's best-selling drug, by the way, bringing in $3.46
billion with a "b" in sales worldwide in 2005, almost one-fifth of the
company's total revenues.
Columbine mass-killer Eric Harris was taking Luvox like Paxil and
Zoloft (and trendsetter Prozac), a modern and widely prescribed type of
antidepressant called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or SSRIs.
Harris and fellow student Dylan Klebold went on a hellish school shooting
rampage in 1999 during which they killed 12 students and a teacher and
wounded 24 others before turning their guns on themselves.
Luvox manufacturer Solvay Pharmaceuticals concedes that during short-term
controlled clinical trials 4 percent of children and youth taking Luvox
that's 1 in 25 developed mania, a dangerous and violence-prone
mental derangement characterized by extreme excitement and delusion.
The inescapable truth is, perpetrators of many of the nation's most
horrendous murder rampages in recent years were taking, or just coming off
of, prescribed psychiatric drugs.
Most recently, authorities investigating Cho Seung-Hui, who murdered 32
at Virginia Tech in April, reportedly found "prescription drugs" for the
treatment of psychological problems among his possessions. While the coroner
reported no drugs were found in Cho's bloodstream on the day of the crime,
April 16, the killer's roommate Joseph Aust told the Richmond Times-Dispatch
Cho's routine each morning had included taking prescription drugs.
So what kind of meds might Cho have been taking? Strangely, his medical
records have yet to be released to the public authorities claiming it's
because an investigation is still ongoing, although critics suggest the
purpose may be to protect the drug companies from liability claims.
Indeed, pharmaceutical manufacturers are nervous about lawsuits over the
"rare adverse effects" of their mood-altering medications. To avoid costly
settlements and public relations catastrophes such as when GlaxoSmithKline
was ordered to pay $6.4 million to the family of 60-year-old Donald Schnell
who murdered his wife, daughter and granddaughter in a fit of rage shortly
after starting on Paxil drug companies' legal teams have quietly and
skillfully settled hundreds of cases out-of-court, shelling out hundreds of
millions of dollars to plaintiffs. Pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly fought
scores of legal claims against Prozac in this way, settling for cash before
the complaint could go to court while stipulating that the settlement remain
secret and then claiming it had never lost a Prozac lawsuit.
Meanwhile, the list of killers who happened to be taking psychiatric
medications is long and chilling. Remember these headline names?
Patrick Purdy's 1989 schoolyard shooting rampage in
Stockton, Calif., was the catalyst for the legislative frenzy to ban
"semiautomatic assault weapons" in California and the nation. The
25-year-old Purdy, who murdered five children and wounded 30, had been on
Amitriptyline, an antidepressant, as well as the antipsychotic drug
Kip Kinkel, 15, murdered his parents in 1998 and the next
day went to his school, Thurston High in Springfield, Ore., and opened
fire on his classmates, killing two and wounding 22 others. He had been
prescribed both Prozac and Ritalin.
In 1988, 31-year-old Laurie Dann went on a shooting rampage
in a second-grade classroom in Winnetka, Ill., killing one child and
wounding six. She had been taking the antidepressant Anafranil as well as
Lithium, long used to treat mania.
In Paducah, Ky., in late 1997, 14-year-old Michael Carneal,
son of a prominent attorney, traveled to Heath High School and started
shooting students in a prayer meeting taking place in the school's lobby,
killing three and leaving another paralyzed. Carneal reportedly was on
In 2005, 16-year-old Native American Jeff Weise, living on
Minnesota's Red Lake Indian Reservation, shot and killed nine people and
wounded five others before killing himself. Weise had been taking Prozac.
In another famous case, 47-year-old Joseph T. Wesbecker,
just a month after he began taking Prozac, shot 20 workers at Standard
Gravure Corp. in Louisville, Ky., killing nine. Prozac-maker Eli Lilly
later settled a lawsuit brought by survivors.
Kurt Danysh, 18, shot his own father to death in 1996, a
little more than two weeks after starting on Prozac. Danysh's description
of own his mental-emotional state at the time of the murder sounded
strikingly similar to that of 12-year-old Christopher Pittman, who had
shot his grandparents while on psychiatric meds. "I didn't realize I did
it until after it was done," Danysh said. "This might sound weird, but it
felt like I had no control of what I was doing, like I was left there just
holding a gun."
These are only a few of the best-known offenders who had been taking
prescribed psychiatric drugs before committing their violent crimes there
are many others.
Substituting pills for couches
When the subject of violent crimes and linkage to psychiatric drugs comes
up, two distinct views emerge.
The mental-health establishment's view is that these drugs have no
"proven" role in enabling such horrific deeds, or at least that their
benefits far outweigh whatever negative reactions may rarely occur.
According to this view, of the millions of people taking these medications
the vast majority are helped and the few who end up committing violent acts
probably would have snapped anyway with or without the drugs.
The other, contrarian view is that the drugs are dangerous and harmful,
turning previously nonviolent people into homicidal maniacs. At a very
minimum, critics contend, the meds push some individuals, already living on
the edge of sanity, over the edge into violence. In addition to a growing
corps of health professionals and a sizeable pile of peer-reviewed studies
corroborating this view, the drug companies themselves compelled by FDA
labeling requirements bolster it with their "black box" label warnings of
increased "suicidal ideation" risk and other negative effects.
But let's pause, putting aside for a moment the dogma of all the
"experts," and consider carefully and deeply what we're really looking at.
We are talking about human beings who have somehow developed a secret
inner life dominated by exceedingly dark thoughts and compulsions. Wild mood
swings. Horrible, consuming resentment teetering on the edge of violent
frenzy. Paranoid delusions fueled by intense emotion. Satanic visitations
and inner voices that torment people mercilessly, sometimes for years,
commanding them to commit murder or suicide or both.
Does this really sound to you like a physiological problem in need
of drugs? Sound like a disease? A biochemical imbalance in the brain?
Neurotransmitter activity that's too sluggish?
Or does it possibly sound like something much more mental-emotional, even
spiritual, in origin?
The truth is, if we think we can solve problems like these with pills, we
might be just as delusional as the people we're trying to help.
Before we go on, let's state the obvious: There are genuine, organic
brain diseases that may benefit from drug therapy but these are relatively
rare. And there are also instances where an individual is so psychotic as to
pose a direct danger to him/herself and others, where sedation might be
appropriate. But what I'm writing about here is the overwhelming majority of
cases where psychiatric drugs are unwisely relied on to fix Americans'
In search of a quick, painless fix for the problems we develop when we
fail to deal with the stresses of life properly, we've become a nation of
drug-takers. Millions of us "medicate" the pain of life away by taking
illegal drugs. And millions more take prescription drugs to accomplish much
the same thing. As Fortune magazine reported in November 2005:
Nearly 150 million U.S. prescriptions were dispensed in 2004 for
SSRIs and similar antidepressants called SNRIs, according to IMS Health,
a Fairfield, Conn., drug data and consulting company more than for any
other drug except codeine. Perhaps one out of 20 adult Americans are on
them now, making brands like Zoloft, GlaxoSmithKline's Paxil, Forest
Laboratories' Celexa, and Solvay Pharmaceuticals' Luvox household names.
Though they don't work for everybody many people have gone off the
medicines because of side effects such as dampening of sexual response
they've done more than any other class of drugs to spur psychiatry's
substitution of pills for couches.
In fact, we're popping so many SSRIs that their breakdown products in
urine, gushing into waterways, have accumulated in fish tissues, raising
concerns that aquatic animals may be getting toxic doses, according to
recent research at Baylor University.
When we've gotten to the point of poisoning fish, you know we're talking
about a lot of drugs. And that's counting only antidepressants. What
about all the other types of psychiatric meds we consume, including the
tens of millions of prescriptions for Ritalin and other controversial
stimulants taken by children and adults diagnosed with ADD (or ADHD) a
condition that didn't even exist until the 1980s?
Not too long ago, the counseling arts recognized that people suffering
from mental-emotional, developmental problems needed self-understanding
first and foremost. This was a noble and vital goal. But today, as Fortune
points out, psychiatry has substituted "pills for couches." Like mad
scientists, our "experts" fool around with the intricacies of people's
brains, monkeying with the levels of neurotransmitters like serotonin and
norepinephrine to artificially "elevate mood."
Thus we have the spectacle of troubled people coming to mental-health
experts with serious personal problems emotional conflicts, fears,
obsessions, compulsions and perhaps delusions rooted in early trauma, or in
seriously flawed family relationships, or in buried resentments toward
cruelty and injustice that were never resolved but just festered and grew.
Yet, instead of being helped to understand where they've gone wrong, or
where their negative programming, unhealthy relationships and destructive
attitudes came from so they can correct them and find genuine healing,
they're given clever drugs designed to chemically trick the body and mind
into "feeling better."
And then, when they discontinue taking the drugs, they risk serious
deterioration of their condition. But isn't that exactly what happens when
we just mask symptoms and ignore root causes?
Moreover, why do even the smartest and most educated of our experts today
tend reflexively to ignore root causes?
Because root causes have to do with God and our relationship, or lack
thereof, with Him.
I guarantee that many people who read that last sentence either glazed
over it or were somehow put off by it.
I'll say it again using different words: We need to wake up to the
spiritual dimension of life or we will never be able to understand what goes
wrong with us, or to genuinely resolve our problems.
Unfortunately, right now many of us are in love with the idea that there
is no God. Books currently riding high atop national best-seller lists
include "God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything" by Christopher
Hitchens, "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins and "The End of Faith" by
Sam Harris all of them unapologetically rabid atheist manifestos.
For an atheist, the problem here is that although you can still be a good
engineer or a skillful surgeon, if you're trying to help people who are full
of rage and conflict and plagued by dark thoughts and malevolent inner
voices urging them to kill people, you're worse than clueless. Worse
because your lethal combination of prideful arrogance and utter lack of
comprehension of what you're actually dealing with will inevitably lead you
to "fix" such problems in ways that not only don't help people, but vastly
multiply their woes and those of their victims.
Don't worry, it's not your fault
Until the last 50 years or so, Western man believed the Creator put us
here on this magnificent globe we call earth, and that we, alone among all
creatures, were given the ability and destiny to choose between good and
Today's cultural elite, including those in the healing arts, basically
don't recognize the existence of God, morality, good and evil, righteousness
and sin. In other words, they don't understand what life is all about that
each and every one of us on this earth is appealed to, from just beyond the
visible world, by a dimension of good and a dimension of evil, which we call
Heaven and Hell. And that by heeding the wrong impulses we get into serious
Instead, they look at man and see a soulless human animal whose behavior
problems are mostly genetic or organic in origin and, in any event,
manageable with drugs.
The truth is, most mental-health pill-dispensing practitioners don't
really understand why people become "clinically depressed" or why some women
experience "postpartum depression" and the like. Go search WebMD and five or
10 other websites on postpartum depression (or most any other psychiatric
condition for that matter). You'll be stunned at the lack of real substance
and insight with regard to what causes it. Instead, you'll read
something like, "The causes haven't been pinpointed yet," along with reams
of authoritative-sounding data on symptoms and predisposing factors and what
drugs to take and how valuable it is to have a support group and what
vitamins help in recovery and so on. But no one will tell you what on earth
would make a woman want to kill herself after she gives birth to her child.
They don't know.
Yet, can there be any doubt that somewhere there are real, understandable
reasons for this and other syndromes reasons a normal person with common
sense could comprehend and act upon, and find real healing, if only the
"expert" counseling them knew what they were talking about?
While understanding is in short supply today, the mental-health
establishment is great at naming syndromes and conditions probably to give
the rest of us the impression they know more than they really do.
Are you a normal boy who doesn't really like shutting up and sitting at a
desk for six hours a day listening to some boring teacher? You may have
"attention deficit disorder." Are you an angry volcano inside? Then you
suffer from "intermittent explosive disorder." Do you get drunk to deal with
your problems? That used to be considered a moral failing, a character
weakness, a failure to face your problems with courage and honesty. Now, of
course, it's a disease called "alcoholism."
Today, everything is physiological and genetic and treated with
drugs. Nothing is your fault. You're an innocent victim.
Furthermore, many of us like it that way. We like the idea that
whatever is wrong with us is an organic disorder, that there's no sin, no
weakness, no deficit of character on our part. Our egos love that, it
In July 2005, actress Brooke Shields told the New York Times about her
postpartum depression: "In a strange way, it was comforting to me when my
obstetrician told me that my feelings of extreme despair and my suicidal
thoughts were directly tied to a biochemical shift in my body. Once we admit
that postpartum is a serious medical condition, then the treatment becomes
more available and socially acceptable. With a doctor's care, I have since
tapered off the medication, but without it, I wouldn't have become the
loving parent I am today."
Brooke Shields is a lovely and principled lady, but I assure you that God
did not design us to be depressed and suicidal after childbirth. We would do
better to stop blaming all our psychological-spiritual problems on chemical
Drugging our conscience
I began to suspect psychiatric meds were problematic three decades ago
after a conversation with a friend who, to relieve her anxiety, had been
taking the sedative Valium then the nation's top-selling pharmaceutical. A
spiritually perceptive lady, she summarized her experience this way: "David,
do you know what the Valium did for me? It deactivated my conscience."
And just recently, another Christian lady anonymously wrote a highly
thought-provoking essay primarily for the benefit of other female members
in her church on the effect antidepressants had on her.
Stressed-out and depressed, she had sought her pastor's spiritual counsel
and he told her to go on antidepressants.
"Not a word was said about my sinful attitudes regarding my
responsibilities, and there were no offers of practical help," she wrote.
"Just go to the doctor. He proceeded to tell me about many other women in
our church who had taken his advice and were doing great. In retrospect,
this makes sense ours was a 'happy church.' No one seemed to struggle with
any serious life issues. Only smiling, happy greetings and small talk.
Imagine the 'Stepford Wives' at church and youll get the picture."
Within weeks, she wrote, she was feeling better. "By two months into
treatment I was doing swimmingly, smiling and small-talking with the best of
I was handling the stress better and sleeping well. Most of my
physical complaints were gone, and I felt very capable. Life went on."
Five years later, unhappy with their "happy" church, she and her husband
sought out and joined a more traditional and biblical church "where sin is
called sin, and people are held accountable."
At the new church, she said, "I met people who grieve over their sin.
This was foreign to me. I have never cried over my sin. I have felt bad for
my sin, but I have never truly grieved over it.
I began to think that
perhaps that little pill that was meant to 'take the edge off' was
preventing me from grieving over sin. One thing I had noticed since being on
it was that I could not cry. Nothing could bring me to tears, and I mean
nothing. I didnt even cry when my dad died, not even as I watched him
take his last breath, uncertain where he would spend eternity. No tears.
After much thought and prayer, she finally decided to get off her
medication. As a result, she wrote:
Last week, after I sinned in anger at my son, I was grieved! I had
asked for forgiveness from him and from the Lord, but I could not deny a
deep sense of grief in my soul as I realized this had been a pattern of
sinful anger for years. I had committed this same sin many times before,
but felt justified, either by stressful circumstances in my life or by
my sons bad behavior. I had never before felt such grief over my own
sin, and I knew I could not indulge one more outburst like this.
The antidepressants, she concluded, had "blurred the ends of the
emotional spectrum, so that I experienced neither deep sadness nor great
joy. I have now come to appreciate that both are vital to the Christian
life. Oh, I was somewhat happy, and able to cope with life quite well, but
the edge was off, not only from my sadness, but from my joy as well."
She added: "In the beginning, the drug was good, because it enabled me to
think rationally and come out of my basement. If I had used that rational
thinking to get a grip on the sin that was pulling me down into depression,
I could have dealt with it biblically, and been off the drug in short order.
But I did not. I became dependent on those pills and was gradually numbed to
the seriousness of my sin. By Gods grace, I came to the recognition that
this drug could be stunting my spiritual growth, and that turned out to be
exactly the case."
The possibility that psychiatric drugs could impair our conscience should
not come as a shock. We know people do bad things under the influence of
alcohol, crack and meth that they wouldn't do otherwise. Is it so hard,
then, to comprehend that some legal drugs can also obscure or
eliminate our awareness of conscience? After all, what does "feeling better"
often involve but the elimination of conflict? And what is conflict but the
evidence inside us that we've done something wrong something contrary to
our conscience? Getting rid of conflict, then, often involves blotting out
But the problem with that is, conscience is literally the presence of God
in us, the friction between the way we are and the way He wants us to be. We
experience this correcting and illuminating presence which is actually our
greatest friend (like Jiminy Cricket in Disney's "Pinocchio") as a psychic
pain when we deviate from its urgings. Thus, many of us foolishly come to
regard conscience as a problem, even an enemy.
Healing through forgiveness
God is not far away or elusive, He's ever-present. But we block His help
and His life in us when we escape from our conscience in various ways
especially when we lose sight of our own faults through being angry at those
I wonder, is it just possible that the Lord's Prayer the blueprint
Jesus Christ gave us for how to relate to God could provide insight on how
to heal what we call "mental illness"? Let's take a fresh look:
After this manner therefore pray
ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come. Thy will be
done in earth, as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our debts, as we
forgive our debtors.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the
glory, for ever. Amen. (Matthew 6:9-13 KJV)
Think about this for a minute. Jesus starts out by telling us to honor
God and humble our will before His and seek His continued sustenance. (No
problem, we think.)
Later He advises us to ask God's protection as we acknowledge His
supremacy in all things. (Great, makes perfect sense, we think.)
But in between comes one line that delivers the essential, life-changing
commandment it's the nuclear core of His message, the fulcrum of change in
our lives, the place where miraculous things happen to us or don't, if we
don't heed it:
"And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors."
This is where we live or die spiritually, it's where we find true
happiness and innocence, or conflict and separation from God.
In fact, immediately following the Lord's Prayer, Jesus re-emphasizes the
forgiveness requirement in the starkest terms imaginable, to make sure
nobody misses His most crucial point:
"For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also
forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your
Father forgive your trespasses." (Matthew 6:14-15)
Wow. That gets my attention.
Forgiveness that is, finding the grace to give up anger and resentment
at injustice is healing. The problem is, anger and rage (unforgiveness)
feed our pride, a part of our makeup that cannot live without constant meals
of impatience, resentment and emotional upset. So until we're ready to let
the life of pride and sin inside us wither and die, we find it pretty much
impossible to truly forgive. Anger is like a drug even worse, like a
nutrient for our wrong self.
Ever wonder why we use the word "mad" to mean both angry and insane? Very
simply, if someone does something wrong to you and you get angry, you've
just become a little bit insane. Now multiply that single event by 1,000 or
10,000 and let the pile of angry reactions and upsets build and smolder for
years, and you'll see that every conceivable manner of strange behavior,
programming, compulsion and delusion can easily take root in us.
Example: In the Islamic world, millions of children are nourished on
hatred from the day they're born hatred of Jews, Christians, Americans,
women, pigs, you name it and they reliably grow up into crazy,
death-loving jihadists. It's like an assembly line with good quality
control; you can count on the outcome. Infect them with hatred from birth,
and you're guaranteed a good recruit in the Mahdi army a few years later. Do
you get it? It's the hatred that allows the conditioning the insane,
ungodly, alien programming to take hold of their minds.
As a child, people bigger and meaner than you make you upset, and when
you're upset you're suggestible or programmable and that's when you pick
up your conditioning. Then, no matter how crazy or illogical or
self-destructive your programming, you'll defend it because it feels like
the real you.
So, nourished by this nutrient-base of suppressed rage and resentment,
and reinforced each passing day by new angers and irritations, we grow up
tangled and conflicted. We all suffer in varying degrees from this madness
covered up, of course, by smiles and self-deception. It's why we need
Who's talking in my head?
Some of us, unfortunately, become so lost in our inner, angry, delusional
world, so identified with the dark thoughts and impulses that occur to us,
that we allow an evil entity of some sort to take up residence within us.
Some years back, a 24-year-old Mexican male traumatized the small
community in which I live by kidnapping, torturing, raping and murdering two
11-year-old girls. (I was acquainted with one of the victim's families.) The
perpetrator later confessed to authorities that he heard inner voices and
gave himself over to their commands, acting out their demonic suggestions.
Same with David Berkowitz, the notorious "Son of Sam" serial killer who
terrorized New York City during the 1970s. Berkowitz claimed his neighbor's
dog, Harvey, was possessed by an ancient demon and that it commanded
Berkowitz to kill. Andrea Yates heard voices in her head for years. The
examples are legion.
This "voices" phenomenon is very common drugs or no drugs and not
just among crazies and criminals. In fact, it's more common than we'd like
to think. Remember all those Bible passages in which Jesus exorcises
"unclean spirits" or "devils"? Let's revisit one of them:
And there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit; and he
Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of
Nazareth? Art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, the
Holy One of God.
And Jesus rebuked him, saying, Hold thy peace, and come out of him.
And when the unclean spirit had torn him, and cried with a loud
voice, he came out of him.
And they were all amazed, insomuch that they questioned among
themselves, saying, What thing is this? What new doctrine is this? For
with authority commandeth he even the unclean spirits, and they do obey
him. (Mar 1:23-27 KJV)
Although Jesus "cast out" demons left and right, today most of us scoff
at the very idea. Even if we cautiously acknowledge it it is obviously
biblical, after all we're still uncomfortable with it. For us, demonic
possession conjures up images of "The Exorcist" and child-actress Linda
Blair's head spinning and spewing green projectile vomit.
Yet, a quarter century ago, the chief psychologist at a major California
mental hospital conducted an extraordinary study of the inner voices
patients heard. Wilson Van Dusen worked among the mentally ill for 17 years
at the Mendocino State Hospital originally Mendocino State Asylum for the
Insane established in 1889.
In his treatise, titled "The Presence of Spirits in Madness," Van Dusen
provided a window into the inner experience of his patients'
"hallucinations." Note that these were not criminally insane people who had
perpetrated violent acts, but rather were simply "mentally ill" individuals
who had been committed to the institution. So their condition was not as
serious or dangerous as that of the criminal perpetrators referenced
"Out of my professional role as a clinical psychologist in a state mental
hospital and my own personal interest, I set out to describe as faithfully
as possible mental patients' experiences of hallucinations," he wrote:
The average layman's picture of the mentally ill as raving lunatics
is far from reality. Most of these people have become entangled in inner
processes and simply fail to manage their lives well.
After dealing with hundreds of such patients, I discovered about four
years ago that it was possible to speak to their hallucinations. To do
so I looked for patients who could distinguish between their own
thoughts and the things they heard and saw in the world of
hallucinations. The patient was told that I simply wanted to get as
accurate a description of their experiences as possible. I held out no
hope for recovery or special reward. It soon became apparent that many
were embarrassed by what they saw and heard and hence they concealed it
Also they knew their experiences were not shared by others, and some
were even concerned that their reputations would suffer if they revealed
the obscene nature of their voices. It took some care to make the
patients comfortable enough to reveal their experience honestly. A
further complication was that the voices were sometimes frightened of me
and themselves needed reassurance. I struck up a relationship with both
the patient and the persons he saw and heard. I would question these
other persons directly, and instructed the patient to give a
word-for-word account of what the voices answered or what was seen. In
this way I could hold long dialogues with a patient's hallucinations and
record both my questions and their answers.
One consistent finding was that patients felt they had contact with
another world or order of beings. Most thought these other persons were
living persons. All objected to the term hallucination. Each coined his
own term such as The Other Order, the Eavesdroppers, etc.
For most individuals the hallucinations came on suddenly. One woman
was working in a garden when an unseen man addressed her. Another man
described sudden loud noises and voices he heard while riding in a bus.
Most were frightened, and adjusted with difficulty to this new
experience. All patients describe voices as having the quality of a real
voice, sometimes louder, sometimes softer, than normal voices. The
experience they describe is quite unlike thoughts or fantasies. When
things are seen they appear fully real.
Most patients soon realize
that they are having experiences that others do not share, and for this
reason learn to keep quiet about them. Many suffer insults, threats and
attacks for years from voices with no one around them aware of it. Women
have reported hearing such vile things they felt it would reflect on
them should they even be mentioned.
Lower order voices are as though one is dealing with drunken bums
at a bar who like to tease and torment just for the fun of it. They will
suggest lewd acts and then scold the patient for considering them. They
find a weak point of conscience and work on it interminably. For
instance, one man heard voices teasing him for three years over a
ten-cent debt he had already paid. They call the patient every
conceivable name, suggest every lewd act, steal memories or ideas right
out of consciousness, threaten death, and work on the patient's
credibility in every way. For instance they will brag that they will
produce some disaster on the morrow and then claim honor for one in the
daily paper. They suggest foolish acts (such as: Raise your right hand
in the air and stay that way) and tease if he does it and threaten him
if he doesn't. The lower order can work for a long time to possess some
part of the patient's body. Several worked on the ear and the patient
seemed to grow deafer. One voice worked two years to capture a patient's
eye which visibly went out of alignment. Many patients have heard loud
and clear voices plotting their death for weeks on end, an apparently
nerve-wracking experience. One patient saw a noose around his neck which
tied to "I don't know what" while voices plotted his death by hanging.
They threaten pain and can cause felt pain as a way of enforcing their
power. The most devastating experience of all is to be shouted at
constantly by dozens of voices. When this occurred the patient had to be
All of the lower order are irreligious or anti-religious. Some
actively interfered with the patients' religious practices. Most
considered them to be ordinary living people, though once they appeared
as conventional devils and referred to themselves as demons. In a few
instances they referred to themselves as from hell. Occasionally they
would speak through the patient so that the patient's voice and speech
would be directly those of the voices. Sometimes they acted through the
In his treatise, Van Dusen revealed that he later discovered striking
parallels between his own clinical observations of the "hallucinations" of
"mentally ill" patients and the writings of 18th century Swedish scientist,
Christian mystic and theologian Emanuel Swedenborg. As Van Dusen explained
Swedenborg describes all of life as a hierarchy of beings
representing essentially different orders and yet acting in
correspondence with each other. The Lord acts through celestial angels,
who in turn correspond on a lower level to spiritual angels, who in turn
correspond to a third lower heaven all of which corresponds to and
acts into man. On the opposite side there are three levels of hell
acting out of direct contact into man. Man is the free space and meeting
ground of these great hierarchies. In effect, good and its opposite evil
rule through this hierarchy of beings down to man who stands in the free
space between them. Out of his experiences and choices he identifies
with either or both sides.
These influences coming from both sides are the very life of man. The
man who takes pride in his own powers tends toward the evil side. The
man who acknowledges that he is the receptacle of all that is good, even
the power to think and to feel, tends toward the good side.
Scary stuff. But the obvious question is, how do we avoid falling into
this nightmarish mental world that entraps so many whom we label "mentally
Advice from an angel
An excellent and insightful description of this "tug of war" between
Heaven and Hell for the body, mind and soul of each of us is found in the
ancient Christian book "The Shepherd of Hermas." Though not part of the
canon of the Holy Bible, "Hermas" was widely revered by the early
Christians, praised by church leaders like Tertullian, St. Irenζus, Clement
of Alexandria and Origen, and was frequently read publicly in early churches
to edify the faithful.
A passage describing a conversation between Hermas, a shepherd, and an
angel who has been instructing him on how to live a life pleasing to God, is
titled "That every man has two angels and of the suggestions of both." The
angel says to Hermas:
There are two angels with man; one of righteousness, the other of
8 And I said unto him, Sir, how shall I know that there are two such
angels with man? Hear, says he, and understand.
9 The angel of righteousness, is mild and modest, and gentle, and
quiet. When, therefore, he gets into thy heart, immediately he talks with
thee of righteousness, of modesty, of chastity, of bountifulness, of
forgiveness, of charity, and piety.
10 When all these things come into thy heart, know then that the angel
of righteousness is with thee. Wherefore hearken to this angel and to his
11 Learn also the works of the angel of iniquity. He is first of all
bitter, and angry, and foolish; and his works are pernicious, and
overthrow the servants of God. When therefore these things come into thine
heart; thou shalt know by his works, that this is the angel of iniquity.
12 And I said unto him, Sir, how shall I understand these things?
Hear, says he, and understand; When anger overtakes thee, or bitterness,
know that he is in thee:
13 As also, when the desire of many things, and of the best meats, and
of drunkenness; when the love of what belongs to others, pride, and much
speaking, and ambition; and the like things, come upon thee.
14 When therefore these things arise in thine heart, know that the
angel of iniquity is with thee. Seeing therefore thou knowest his works,
depart from them all, and give no credit to him: because his works are
evil, and become not the servants of God.
15 Here therefore thou hast the works of both these angels. Understand
now and believe the angel of righteousness, because his instruction is
16 For let a man be never so happy; yet if the thoughts of the other
angel arise in his heart, that man or woman must needs sin.
17 But let man or woman be never so wicked, if the works of the angel
of righteousness come into their hearts, that man or woman must needs do
18 Thou seest therefore how it is good to follow the angel of
righteousness. If therefore thou shall follow him, and submit to his
works, thou shalt live unto God. And as many as shall submit to his work
shall live also unto God.
Reading insight like this makes one wonder how many people who've been
diagnosed with bipolar, depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia and
other serious conditions have mysteriously gotten better. Oh, we don't hear
about such things in the news but it happens. They simply get better.
Somehow, privately, they discover how to listen to the right side, and to
shrink from the wrong side. And they allow the light of God to come into
them and shine on their conflicts and untangle their mess mostly, I
believe, by discovering forgiveness. Having truly given up their resentments
and rage, no longer getting upset all the time, their "incurable" mental
illnesses are healed.
We need to revisit the practice of drugging troubled souls. Psychiatry
has totally bought into it and will consider me a Neanderthal or worse. Too
bad. Because they're taking the crown of God's creation, the human mind, and
acting like Dr. Frankenstein engaged in some mad, grandiose experiment,
playing God, pulling people's mood-strings chemically. There's another way.
No doubt there are appropriate times and places to use these medications
rarely. But our increasing reliance on them is creating untold suffering
of a kind and magnitude we can barely imagine. All because of a blindness
that dominates our age a blindness that obscures that which every child
We are born with a good side and we have a bad side. And we need to be
careful which side we listen to. If we listen to the wrong side, terrible
Toward the end of my son's Boy Scout troop meeting not too long ago, the
scoutmaster stood up and used his customary "Scoutmaster Minute" to retell
the famous story an old Cherokee chief supposedly told his grandson. The
"A fight is going on inside me. It is a terrible battle between two
wolves. One wolf represents fear, anger, pride, envy, lust, greed,
arrogance, self-pity, resentment, lies and cruelty.
"The other wolf stands for honesty, kindness, hope, sharing, serenity,
humility, friendship, generosity, truth, compassion and faith.
"This same fight is going on inside you, and inside every other person,
too," he added.
The grandson reflected on these words for a minute and then asked his
grandfather, "Which wolf will win?"
The old chief simply replied, "The one you feed."
SPECIAL OFFER: Get David Kupelian's national best-seller, "The
Marketing of Evil," autographed and personalized, only from WND's online
store. Multiple copies available at bulk discount!
David Kupelian is vice president and managing editor of WorldNetDaily.com
and Whistleblower magazine, and author of the best-selling book, "The
Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us
Corruption Disguised as Freedom." He is a dynamic speaker and has been
featured on Fox News, MSNBC, CBN and many other media outlets.